Search This Blog

11 Feb 2008

Hedge Fund Launches By QIM

US based Quantitative Investment Management(QIM), has launched two new hedge funds, the Quantitative Tactical Fund and the Quantitative Fund. Director of Marketing, John McAllister said of the launches, "The multi-strat gives us an ability to provide a fund of funds using three products that we expect to have very low correlations to each other, and it is expected to have the best Sharpe ratio of all the products."

One of the hedge funds launched is a diversified equities hedge fund, currently trading only U.S. names. With $126.8 million in assets under management, the Tactical Fund trades the 1,500 most liquid U.S. names, with plans to expand into Europe and Japan this year.

The smaller of the two funds, the Quantitative Fund, is a multi-strategy fund of funds with $1 million currently in assets under management. It currently invests solely in the 1X versions of other QIM funds, including the Global, Tactical and the Ultra funds. Allocations made to the fund in 2008 will receive a 10% fee discount for the life of the investment.

With $2.8 billion in assets under management, QIM is a global investment firm specializing in alternative investment strategies for institutional and private investors. QIM employs a proprietary quantitative approach to trading financial and commodity futures through its flagship offering, the QIM Global Program.

Hedge Fund Awareness

A white paper released today by SEI, titled "Five Critical Challenges for Hedge Funds Taking Aim at the Institutional Market", details the growing institutional acceptance of hedge fund investing.

Forty-seven percent of the institutions surveyed said they already invest in hedge funds. Within that group, 73% of pension plans and 55% of institutions overall said they had increased hedge fund allocations over the last several years. Portfolio allocations to hedge funds averaged 30% for endowments, 13% for pension funds, and 24% for institutions.

The paper is based partly on a survey of more than 100 institutional investors by SEI and the research firm of Infovest21.

Hedge fund assets under management have been growing at a compound annual rate of 26% since 1990, reports the SEI analysis, with much of that growth coming from the institutional market. "To maintain that growth trajectory, the hedge fund industry will need to branch out from its traditional high-net-worth, foundation, and endowment clientele to serve the broader institutional market," said Paul Schaeffer, Managing Director of Strategy and Innovation for SEI’s Investment Manager Services division. "But to compete for those assets, the industry must recognise that large institutions have a distinct set of demands concerning issues such as the quality of infrastructure, transparency, and risk."

At the same time, institutions expressed continued concerns with hedge fund investing. “Headline risk” was named by 37% of survey respondents as their biggest worry, followed by lack of transparency (19%) and poor performance (15%). Institutions also remain cautious in selecting hedge funds, the survey found, devoting an average of seven months to due diligence and 12 additional weeks to approval.

In the paper, SEI identifies five challenges hedge funds should address in order to attract more institutional assets:

1) Demonstrate institutional-quality infrastructure and operations. Infrastructure was ranked the number-one criterion in hedge fund selection, with 46% of those surveyed naming it most important. Of those who responded this way, 54% said it was because “better managed firms produce better returns.” The quality of fund administration was a prime concern. Of those respondents most concerned with infrastructure, two-thirds said it is unacceptable for funds to handle their own administration internally, and half demand a “big-name” administrator; 81% said they take steps to verify that hedge fund investments are valued independently.

2) Meet investor demands for reporting and transparency. The lack of transparency was the second most commonly cited worry with hedge fund investing, with 19% of institutions ranking it number one. This concern was greatest at the strategy level, with 85% of respondents saying they would not invest in a strategy they do not fully understand. More than half said they seek portfolio transparency at the industry or sector level, and one-third were most concerned with transparency of the investment process. Only 11% said they seek transparency of specific investment positions.

3) Build stable management teams with a full range of skill sets. Interviewees ranked “people at the firm” as the third most important factor in hedge fund selection, surpassed only by “firm infrastructure” and “performance.” Other survey responses revealed that investor concerns with hedge funds’ organisational stability and staffing are not confined to those making investment decisions, but cut across all key management and support positions.

4) Shift focus from performance to investment disciplines. Institutions are as concerned with investment process and risk profile as they are with the level of absolute returns, the survey revealed. Interviewees ranked “consistent, stable returns,” “uncorrelated returns,” and “high risk-adjusted returns” as more important objectives than “high absolute returns.” Seventy-two percent of interviewees said the investment strategy, rather than performance, is their starting point for hedge fund selection.

5) Keep abreast of public policy and regulatory trends. Citing ongoing deliberations over hedge-fund-related regulation, tax policies, and accounting rules and investor concerns with “headline risk,” the paper urges the industry to “commit whatever resources are needed to ensure that hedge fund managers meet the highest possible standards for their overall compliance and general business practices.”
“The overriding message is that institutions clearly prefer to do business with institutional-style organisations,” concluded Schaeffer. “For hedge funds, the challenge will be to fit the profile of an institutional-quality fund while preserving the performance attributes that attracted major investors in the first place.”