
The complaint further alleges that Kane belatedly provided incomplete information purporting to show that the Funds were valued at less than $100 million. At the same time, the complaint cites a circular to investors in which Kane boasted that assets under management during the period in question actually exceeded $150 million -- well over the threshold at which he was obligated to pay his ex-partner management and incentive fees. Thus, the complaint alleges, Kane kept the fees that were rightfully due to his ex-partner. A conservative calculation of those fees puts them well into the six figures.
The defendant, Chris Kane of New Canaan, Connecticut, parted ways with his partner in 2006.
No comments:
Post a Comment